Alaska Patriot News

New Media for Alaska's Patriotic Voices

Now, thanks to the offending provisions of this year's National Defense Authorization Act, we finally know what is wrong with America.  If you have the patience to read 40 pages of highly enlightening information, you, too, can know how your country was usurped, how, when, and by whom.  The answers won't exactly surprise you, but they will make you mad.  Here is the Addendum being in support of our Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus being filed with the Alaska Supreme Court, Case Number S14542. Read this short Excerpt from Ground 16 of the Petition:

Ground 16The immediate history related to these issues, that is, the proposed infringement of the Petitioners’ Right to Contract, Right to Due Process, and specifically, their right to assert their Contract of Citizenship proposed by the Patriot Act and the NDAA (2012), reveals that the current infringements against contract and general usurpation of authority are part and parcel of actions taken against the Petitioners and their Progenitors beginning in 1933.  The passage of the Patriot Act and the offending provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 merely mark “another chapter” in a long process of fraud, deceit, infringement, and usurpation, from which Petitioners seek immediate and material relief.

               Petitioners have already demonstrated the existence of three common meanings of the words “United States of America”: (1) the 50 States United,  (2)  Respondents, the US Corporation per Title 28, 3002, (15) (A) (B) (C) and (3) “the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam…..et alia”.   The existence of three such meanings of the same words should give the Justices of the Alaska Supreme Court reason to pause and admit.  Why three common meanings of the same words?  These usages developed naturally and bear materially on the current issues and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus being presented.  The Petitioners present the documented history leading up to these current acts of the Respondents in support of their Petition:

 

               The United States went "Bankrupt" in 1933 and was declared so by President Roosevelt in Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and finally, as consolidated in Executive Order 6260, (See: Senate Report 93-549, pages 187 & 594) under the "Trading With The Enemy Act" (Sixty-Fifth Congress,  Sess. I, Chs. 105, 106, October 6, 1917), and as codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95a.

               The several States of the Union then pledged the faith and credit thereof to the aid of the National Government, and formed numerous committees, such as the "Council of State Governments", the "Social Security Administration", etc., to purportedly deal with the economic "Emergency" caused by the bankruptcy. These organizations operated under the "Declaration of Interdependence" of January 22, 1937, and published some of their activities in "The Book of the States."

               The Reorganization of the bankruptcy is located in Title 5 of the United States Code Annotated. The "Explanation" at the beginning of 5 U.S.C.A. is most informative reading.  The "Secretary of Treasury" was appointed as the "Receiver" in Bankruptcy.  (See: Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903,  Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967)  As a Bankrupt loses control over his business, this appointment to the "Office of Receiver" in bankruptcy had to have been made by the "creditors" who are "foreign powers or principals".

               The United States as Corporator, (22 U.S.C.A. 286E, et seq.) and "State" (C.R.S. 24-36- 104, C.R.S.  24-60-1301(h)) had declared "Insolvency."  (See: 26 I.R.C.  165(g)(1), U.C.C.  1-201(23), C.R.S. 39-22--103.5, Westfall vs.  Braley, 10 Ohio 188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W.  2d 911; Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall. 447)

                A permanent state of "Emergency" was instituted within the Union and the Federal Reserve has acted as the "fiscal and depository agent" of the “creditors” ever since. Please note that the member banks of the Federal Reserve are all privately owned corporations, 22 U.S.C.A. 286d.

               The government, by becoming a “corporator” (See:  22 U.S.C.A. 286e)  lays down its sovereignty and takes on that character and status of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter.  (See: The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L.  Ed. (9 Wheat) 244, U.S. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242). 

               The Corporate Charter adopted by the “federal corporation”, aka, US Corp, included The Constitution of the United States of America as its By-Laws. The Constitution of the United States of America remains also as a public contract, which the Petitioners assert is owed enforcement by the State of Alaska, Inc.

                The real party in interest is not the de jure "United States of America" or "State", but "The Bank" and "The Fund."  (22 U.S.C.A. 286, et seq., C.R.S.  11-60-103)  These acts committed under fraud, force, and seizure are many times done under "Letters of Marque and Reprisal" i.e. "recapture." (See: 31 U.S.C.A. 5323)  in behalf of Foreign governments at war. This is an important point to remember as this discussion goes forward in time.

               On March 17, 1993, on page 1303 of Volume 33 of the Congressional Record, Congressman Traficant stated:  "Mr. Speaker, We are now here in Chapter 11.  Members of Congress are official Trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government."

               The “U.S. government” is the government domiciled in the District of Columbia, which at various times purports to represent three distinct entities: (1) the US Corporation formed as we have just seen and as documented at Title 28, 3002, (15) (A) (B) (C), (2) the “United States of America” defined as the 50 States United or “the Union of 50 States”, and (3) the “United States of America” defined as the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, et alia. In this comment Congressman Traficant was including all three primary meanings of “U.S. Government” as the term “General Government” or “U.S. Government” with a capital “G” is traditionally used in the Congressional Record when this meaning is applied----however, there is no indication that the States ever went “bankrupt” except as voluntary adjuncts. The actual subject of the bankruptcy was the Foreign Corporation known as the “United States of America” defined as the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, et alia.

               This confession by Congressman Traficant applies, not only to "Members of Congress," but also to the Secretary of the Treasury as the "Receiver in bankruptcy" and to all state and federal "officials" who act under the de facto authority of  that bankrupt Foreign Corporation known as the United States acting as Trustees (that is, Foreign Agents) for foreign principals.  Trustees work for the creditors of a bankruptcy and are agents for foreign principals.

               In this case the creditors are the Federal Reserve Banks, the International Monetary Fund (the Fund) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the Bank).

               It is worthy of note that an Attorney/Representative is required to file a "Foreign Agents Registration Statement" pursuant to 22 U.S.C.A 611c(1)(iv) & 612), when representing the interests of a Foreign Principal or Power. (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 613, Rabinowitz vs. Kennedy, 376 U.S. 605, 11 L. Ed. 2d 940, 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951).  This same requirement was later extended to non-attorney representatives as required by Trinsey v. Pagliaro.  As a result, every official and every attorney representing this version of “federal government”, and including the Respondents, is a Foreign Agent and under obligation to declare him or herself as such and file the Foreign Agents Registration Statement.

               The contrived "emergency" of the bankruptcy has created numerous abuses and usurpations, and abridgments of delegated Powers and Authority as clearly stated in Senate Report 93-549 (1973):

               "A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule.  For 40 years, [78 years now] freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by statutes of national emergency."

               The current Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus has arisen under precisely this circumstance. The Respondents are claiming that they have Authority to arbitrarily and indefinitely detain Americans without recourse to Due Process, based on unproven allegations of “belligerent acts” against the government. Once again, these infringements are being asserted as a response to an “emergency” situation that doesn’t really exist.

               According to 16 American jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Sections 71 and 82, no "emergency" justifies a violation of any Constitutional provision.  Arguendo, "Supremacy Clause" and "Separation of Powers", yet it is clearly admitted in Senate Report No.  93-549, that abridgment has occurred.

               On March 6, 1933 the federal government got the Conference of Governors to pledge the faith and credit of the several States of the Union and their citizenry to the aid of the National Government, (see pp. 18 - 24 of The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin Roosevelt, Volume II, The Year Of Crisis, March 6, 1933) for what they openly admitted to doing. They also encouraged the President to ask for and use extra-constitutional powers during the "emergency" that continues to this day. 

               This was a completely voluntary action on the part of the Governors acting at that time representing the 50 States United which were NOT the subjects of the bankruptcy.  The Governors arbitrarily claimed to have the granted Authority to commit the full faith and credit of the 50 States and also claimed the Authority to add the full faith and credit of the State’s “citizenry” as credit in behalf of the “United States of America” defined as the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, et alia. 

               The Governors had no such granted Authority. It was FRAUD for them to pledge the faith and credit of the State, which they did not own, as collateral. Likewise it was purely fraudulent for the Governors to claim “ownership” of the citizenry of the State, or claim any granted Authority or possession of any inherent right to commit the “full faith and credit” of the citizenry of the several (50) States in payment of the debts of a Foreign Corporation. 

               The Citizens of the 50 States United are and were private and unincorporated living entities, who never acted or granted authority to anyone to act in their behalf in this manner whatsoever. They (and we) never gave permission to any entity to define them (us) as corporate entities, nor as “debtors” subject to the bankruptcy proceedings of any Foreign Corporation.   The Petitioners and their Progenitors never gave their consent to this action undertaken by the Governors and were for the most part never even made aware of it.

               The Petitioners note:

               "Emergency does not create power.  Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved.  The Constitution was adopted IN a period of grave emergency.  Its grants of power to the Federal Government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency and they are NOT altered by emergency." [Emphasis added] Home Building & Loan Assoc. v  Blaisdell 290 US 426 (1934).

               The Respondents, Members of Congress, have no “special” or “extra” powers during an emergency, declared or undeclared, yet that is what they specifically and dishonestly claimed in 1933 and what they are continuing to claim as the excuse for their infringements against The Constitution of the United States of America today.  Likewise the Governors of the 50 States United acting in 1933 had no new, special, different, or greater claim upon the resources of their States or upon the Citizens of those States as a result of any economic emergency affecting the “United States of America” as defined as “….the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam…..et alia”. 

               Likewise, powers and property interests that the Governors didn’t possess prior to the “emergency” did not magically accrue to them as the result of any emergency, economic or otherwise. Their action pledging the “full faith and credit” of the 50 States and their citizenry was pure fraud and extortion practiced at the level of State government.  As in all cases of fraud, the victims were not notified of any such agreement being made in their behalf, for the simple reason that the Citizens of the 50 States would never have agreed to it.

     "The Constitution of the United States is a LAW for rulers and people equally in war and peace,  and covers with the shield of its protection ALL classes of men, at ALL times, and under ALL circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was EVER invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of the government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or to despotism." [Statement of Opinion, U.S. Supreme Court, Annals 1866, in response to a new class of proposed infringing Reconstruction legislation that was similarly promoted on the basis “national emergency”.]

               The property interests of the 50 States United, their land and resources, including the “full faith and credit” of the citizenry so gratuitously offered by the treasonous Governors,  was the collateral accepted by the creditors (foreign principals) so the “federal government” aka, “United States of America” as defined as “the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam…et alia” could borrow more Federal Reserve Notes (private bank credit) and keep operating under reorganization.  Roosevelt issued Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 and 6260:

               Executive Order 6073 issued on March 10, 1933, created the "bank holiday" and closed the doors of the bankrupt government chartered banks (they were bankrupted as a whole because they operated under government charter, and because of the Great Fraud committed by the Governors of the several States, not because they were individually bankrupt).

               Executive Order 6102  issued on April 5, 1933,  prohibited "hoarding" gold and required people to turn it (their property) in to the Federal Reserve Banks (the creditors).

               Executive Order 6111 issued on April 20, 1933, prohibited people from exporting gold.

               The affects of this particular Executive Order provide clear and trenchant proof of the fraudulent nature of the claim and the purposeful intent of the foreign government exerting it.     The creditors claimed that the gold no longer belonged to the State Citizens, as a result of having been pledged by their State Governors, one of the first dire results of the many illegal actions taken under the auspices of the Great Fraud.    

               The “United States” did indeed seize the gold and claimed—fraudulently---to assert the credit of the States and citizenry as cited, but because they had to remain in Honor internationally and create a “remedy” equal to the public liability they established, they set up a system whereby the people so defrauded got to charge off all bills presented to them via a process of “debt” forgiveness known as Accepted for Value.

               Of course, the same shiftless, criminal, fraud-mongering government responsible for the thefts and false claims to begin with never bothered to mention this “generous” accommodation to the victims, either, so that only those who were “in” on the con were able to discharge their debts. Everyone else got stuck paying double to the banks. 

               The banks acted as middle men in this whole proceeding and pressed the victims to pay them effectively coming and going----first by providing the banks with “debt credit” in the form of “checks” and secondly by charging off the victim’s “debt” using the Accepted for Value process that was supposedly put in place to repay Americans for the confiscation of their gold and their credit.

               Between the tender mercies of the fraud perpetrated by the “federal government” and the self-interested rape by the banks, Americans were immediately deprived of most of their resources and net worth, even though they were (and are) self-evidently the only source of wealth creation for all the predatory legal fictions represented by the “federal government” and the “banks” and the “banking associations”. The text of this whole arrangement is recorded in H.J. Res 192, 73rd Congress, First Session, principally prior enrolled as Public Law, U.S. Statutes at Large, Vol. 1, Public Acts, 3rd Congress, 2nd Session, Chapter 48..  

               Anyone doubting the truth of this has only to haul out their “check” book and read the very, very fine print of the broken line below their signature confirming that the Signature on their check is the “Authorizing” Signature, i.e., authorizing the bank to consider them a “banker” as recorded in Title 12 of Federal Code and to (mis)use their authority to both create the debt credit and the debt discharge, a process known as “twinning” which is extremely illegal, but left to be practiced without oversight or audit of the Federal Reserve Banks.   

               Nobody but the Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for oversight of these “debt accounts” as in “government debt accounts” and he is acting in behalf of the foreign creditors only, so the ability to carry out fraud, extortion, and financial conversion against the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, has been limited only by the extent of their ignorance and will to survive.

               Executive Order 6260 issued on August 20, 1933, combined 6102 and 6111.

               All of this is criminal and self-interested fraud, extortion, unlawful conversion, and treason against The Constitution of the United States of America and against the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska. 

               The Governors of the 50 States acting at that time pledged the PUBLIC property of the State, which they didn’t own, and the PRIVATE property of the State Citizens, property over which they had no reasonable authority and upon which they had no valid material claim, to be surrendered in payment of the debts racked up by the “United States of America” as defined by the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, et alia, and so confiscated private property to pay mammoth public “debts” never authorized and therefore never owed by the Citizens of any of the 50 States, all under color of law and a contrived economic “emergency” and in behalf of a Foreign government.  

               The economic raping and pillaging created by the Great Fraud has continued unabated to the present day.  The proclamations issued by FDR gave force to 470 provisions of Federal law.  These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily and meant to be exercised by a representative Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners.  These unconstitutional powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional process.

               Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.  The several States were seduced into the new policy in 1939, with Roosevelt's promise of federal grants-in-aid. 

               Federal Revenue Sharing (31 U.S.C. ( 6700 etseq.) is the modern version of the grants-in-aid program.  In return for these grants and later, other forms of “federal income”, the Governors of the several States agreed to uphold and maintain their completely unauthorized, illegal, and fraudulent pledge of the life, labor and property of their respective citizenry as surety for the debt obligations of the Federal government.  The politicians of these respective states complied, because they viewed this as an opportunity to increase their own political power, and because in point of fact they are operating as municipal franchise corporations of the same Foreign government and its Agents, letting the next generation of office holders worry over the long term consequences of their acts and conveniently “forgetting” to enforce the contract provisions of The Constitution of the United States of America owed the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska.

               The argument can be made that the State of Alaska as a municipal franchise of the “United States of America” as defined as “….the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico….et alia” cannot sue the parent organization, but that would be inconsistent with International Commercial Law or Admiralty, the only two venues that can be asserted in this instance.  Corporate subsidiaries of all kinds represent individual “persons” holding unique contracts and are perpetually found at Law asserting claims for and against their Franchise Sponsors, as neatly proven by any number of well-known court cases asserted by the State of Alaska against the “United States”.

               The Petitioners hold that enforcement of the provisions of The Constitution of the United States of America is not materially different than the State of Alaska’s responsibility to enforce other contracts.  The de facto “government” gave up its de jure status entirely in 1933, or rather, fraudulently dissolved it and instituted corporate structures to replace the de jure government, becoming equal in status to any other corporate entity on earth by becoming a “corporator”.  The Great Fraud practiced against the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, does in no way destroy any element of valid contract owed them by the “United States of America” or its subsidiaries, nor does it Extinguish any of their own asserted Natural property Rights.  If anything, the overall conditions of fraudulent usurpation and material harm already done to the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, should lend wings to the feet of both the State of Alaska Officials responsible for enforcement and demand equally prompt compliance from the “United States of America” and the Named Respondents.

               Petitioners note that these invalid claims against their persons and property interests were the result of collusion between both State Officials and Federal Officials, all busily and happily digging their unwashed hands into the Petitioners’ pocket under cover of darkness and non-disclosure; process via Executive Orders allowed under the presumption of equally invalid “emergency powers” claimed as a result of the banking collapse created by the Federal Reserve Banks manipulating the currency supply and then in predatory fashion calling in debts of the already unreasonable and improper debts of the “United States of America” defined as “the District of Columbia, Guam, et alia…..” allowed the fraud to be administered largely outside the realm of public cognizance.

               All interested Parties have been duly Noticed that the Petitioners have invoked their proper Rights from under subrogation and are in process to Void Contract absent prompt correction, such that the Respondents and the Officers of the State of Alaska are under Demand to Perform, just as they would be under International Law if they left any other contract derelict for years at a time, exposed those to whom they owe fiduciary responsibility to the frauds and rapacious demands of entities who are themselves DEBTORS with respect to the Petitioners, not Creditors, and certainly not Masters.   

               The blatant self-interest and Disservice to contract exhibited by the Respondents and their Predecessors in Office may be in part to gross ignorance; Petitioners grant that the Respondents may have been taken in by the Great Fraud just as well as anyone else, and they may think, due to decades of dereliction of duty in this regard on the part of the State of Alaska,  that they owe no Due Diligence to the Constitution of the United States of America under contract----but in point of fact, they do.

                Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, cannot and do not entertain speculation regarding the intentions, personal motivations, or degree of understanding possessed by any of the Respondents named as parties to this Petition.  The Respondents are being addressed and given Notice as Office holders.  It is not “personal” and it is not necessary for us to establish any malicious intent on the part of the living entities holding Office. 

               Similarly, we do not entertain our charges against the State of Alaska Officials apart from their actions in Office once duly advised.  This is not about vengeance or even getting even. Given the present level of debt these Respondents have engaged in through the misuse, abuse, and inflation of their fraudulent claims against the Honor and credit of the 50 States United and the Petitioners, no such end result may be hoped for.  What can be accomplished is a prompt settlement of these issues in favor of the Petitioners, summarily protecting the Petitioners from any further predations undertaken at the hands of the Repondents and their fellow undeclared Foreign Agents and an end to Miscarriage and Hemorrhage of Justice in Templum Regis.

               This is about the re-assertion of our Natural, Civil, and Human Rights, respectively, in the face of ongoing contract-infringing legislation enacted under conditions of fraud and extortion against the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, and resulting in the abuse of the credit of the State of Alaska and also the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska created by the Great Fraud.  This is about the  recognition of the Great Fraud itself practiced upon the 50 States United and their citizenry in 1933, and the true nature and meaning of The Constitution of the United States of America as a public contract. The Petitioners, Natural-born Citizens of their Respective States, now inhabiting Alaska, are literally owed performance and due diligence that has not been in evidence for entire decades.

               The “consequences” have come home to this generation of State officials. The Foxes have been in charge of the hen house, in self-evident fact, helping their Sponsors to pillage Petitioners by not enforcing the provisions of The Constitution of the United States of America and consenting with obsequious alacrity to all proposals allowing the Respondents to do any outrageous thing they wish to the Petitioners. Fortunately for the Petitioners (and as it turns out, the State of Alaska Foxes, too) there remains the thorny issue of the underlying Public Contracts to be enforced.  The Petitioners maintain that the State Governors never possessed any such Authority to indebt them nor any valid claim over their private property, nor any vested Authority to commit the “full faith and credit” and thereby the substance of any of the Several (now) 50 States to pay the debts of any Foreign Corporation whatsoever.

               The actual and only existing valid contract between the “United States of America” defined as the 50 States United and the “United States of America” defined as the District of Columbia, et alia, is “The Constitution of the United States of America” together with its provisions and limitations, both in the services to be provided and the means of payment for those services, which are explicitly stated and whether interpreted as law, contract, or Public Policy, are clearly in evidence and must be accepted as contracts because no level of “government” represented either by the Respondents or the Governor of Alaska has recourse to Sovereignty over the 50 States United or the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, by any valid claim, and because by becoming incorporated entities they have no structure competent to function in anywise but under contract as made clear by Erie Railroad v. Thompkins.   

               To the extent that the “United States of America” defined as “the District of Columbia…et alia” and the Respondents have overreached their Authority granted under contract, and abused the credit of the Petitioners and the 50 States United to do it, they are in the same position as an unscrupulous publisher of magazines, who uses the existence of one subscription as an excuse to present other magazines as if subscribed to, and then proposes that the recipients of his unsolicited products and services are under obligation to pay for them.

               No such provision of any kind, now or ever, has existed under any venue of Commerical Law, nor, if anyone should propose, the Law of International Admiralty. The just and universal result of such importunity is that the “magazine publisher” cannot demand payment for any goods or services that have not been knowingly, willingly, and under full disclosure provided under contract. Anything and everything that these Respondents have done in excess of the contract to which the 50 States United subscribed via their fraudulent claims against our credit must be emphatically denied by the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, and is so denied.

               Furthermore, Petitioners having mistakenly paid (or as in this case, having had their credit abused to do so) for goods or services they didn’t order, are entitled under International Law of Commerce to come forward and describe the fraud practiced against them and claim their innocence and restitution before any court of law having jurisdiction over the subject matter and ask for remedy.  The Petitioners and the 50 States United are the ones defrauded by the US Corporation, dba “United States of America” as defined as “…the District of Columbia, et alia”.

In all such cases and as universally recognized, those defrauded must be upheld.

                The State Citizens were not made aware of these actions in 1933, the consequences were never fully disclosed, and none of it was ever voted upon or approved by the State Citizens so impacted and purportedly “indebted”.  Similarly, the State Citizens were never made aware of any ability to present their own Bills as Bills of Exchange under the Accepted for Value process as remedy for the gold resources confiscated by the “government” in 1933, so that the remedy offered in exchange for the liability the perpetrators established was as vacant of Honor as their pledge of “good faith and credit” made against resources they didn’t own. 

               The original Trust Accounts were valued at $300,000 per person worth of debt repayment, and owing to the fact that two generations of Americans have lived and died without ever knowing they had recourse to any remedy, inflation and market conditions, these Trust Accounts are worth more than $7 million per person of guaranteed “debt repayment credit” on paper now, amounting to the piddly amount of $2.8 billion dollars, more or less,  that the US Corporation undoubtedly owes Americans on a per capita basis, but which in its unreasoning, endless greed refuses to pay except with the most pathetic snarling and ill-will toward the people it robbed and defrauded when they show up and present a Bill for payment.  

               Simply paying off this “petty debt” truly would have been a drop in the bucket compared to all the other spending done by the Respondents via the fraudulent claims made against the Petitioners’ credit and the credit of their States and the gross amounts of taxation added in on top of it all as a pressure valve for the fiat money system.  Many Americans who are literally owed @ $7 million per person would have enjoyed keeping their homes, if they had only known (1) that the government absolutely does owe them this money and (2) they have also been the victims of mortgage fraud practiced against them on top of all the rest of the ills which accompanied the insinuation of “fractional reserve banking” into this country. 

               These Acts of the Governors and the Members of Congress and the President of the United States in March of 1933, were blatant, gross, and virulent frauds committed against our Progenitors, and just as it was fraud then, is fraud now, and it cannot be applied by any means of rational argument to the Petitioners. We rightfully and emphatically renounce, deny, reject, and object to any such fraudulent agreements made in our behalf or the behalf of our Progenitors without their knowledge or consent, and certainly without our permission, and we assert our Natural Right (and in the case of “US citizens, Civil Right, and in the case of Non-Foreign entities, Human Right) to be free of the consequences of such constructive fraud, including the 470 separate provisions of Federal Law enacted at that time and those infringing Acts of Congress created since then including those known as the Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012.

               The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus now appearing should be seen in the larger context of re-securing and preserving the property interests of the Petitioners and the 50 States as required by the still-potent public contracts known as The Constitution of the United States of America  and The Constitution of the State of Alaska under the Law of Nations. The fraudulent acts of Governors long-dead cannot be held as debt or credit to this current generation, and no presumption of “debt” can be offered based upon fraud. The debts of the “United States of America” comprised of the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, et alia, are precisely that---their debts. Let them conclude their bankruptcy amid Public recognition that the acts of the State Governors in March of 1933 were fraudulent, and that the private property and “credit” of State Citizens was never within the granted Authority of any State Governor to pledge. 

                As an analogy, the Petitioners will willingly Quit Claim all their property interests in the Island of Majorca, but as they have no property interests in the Island of Majorca, the Quit Claim while a valid instrument has no legitimate effect.  In the same way, the Governors of a State may “pledge” their credit and their property interests in a State or in the credit of the State’s citizenry, but if they personally have no such valid property interest, the pledge is valid but vacant of any legitimate claim. The Governors acting in this manner clearly knew that they were committing fraud and treason against the State and against the Citizens, and in favor of the Creditors enforcing the bankruptcy of the “United States of America” as defined as the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, et alia.

               On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of the United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON.  The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee, and has yet to be acted upon.  (See: the Congressional Record, May 23, 1933, pp.  4055-4058.)

               This is prima facie evidence that the members of the Judiciary Committee have colluded to avoid correction and contractual compliance for almost 80 years.  The Petitioners, unimpeded by any necessity of Articles of Impeachment, denounce the Fraud practiced against them and their Progenitors, and demand that their contractually guaranteed Natural Rights, or in the case of “US citizens” Civil Rights, or in the case of Non-Foreign citizens, Human Rights (under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) must be held inviolate and protected by the State of Alaska, Inc., under contract,  asserting that although they have been Victims of Fraud in the grossest terms imaginable, they are not in any case made Bankrupts, Debtors, Corporate Entities, rendered “property” of any legal fiction, or obligated to yield their “full faith” or their “credit” by acts of constructive fraud practiced against them by treasonous government officials, foreign or domestic, who never possessed granted Authority or property interest to make such “pledges” in the first place.

               We act sui juris.  We are fully Competent. We are Equal Sovereigns. We are not lessened by false claims against us, nor are our Natural Rights Extinguished by acts of fraud against us and our Progenitors, now or in 1933.

               The Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, have observed through the course of their lifetimes the gradual usurpations of this foreign government calling itself the “United States of America’ without understanding the basis of the usurpation and economic predation. Like millions of others, Petitioners assumed that their government in the past was competent and honest and that whatever situation we now faced, we came to be here via a legitimate process.  Such is not the case. These mechanisms to date have served merely to cheat us, enslave us, and to extort our property interests from us under color of law. 

               We, the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, and each one of the several (now 50) States United have been the victims of a very high level, wide-ranging, and importunate Fraud promoted by the elected officials of both the State and Federal governments almost 80 years ago. Since then, we have continued to be the victims of Fraud, as these Foreign entities have under color of law and under pretense of being our de jure government subtly infiltrated our institutions, took over our Offices, and abused our credit to do so.  Unavoidably, though, these same “corporate governments” gave up Sovereignty and are not now “governments” with any de jure status.  They are corporations, albeit, very large and complex corporations, claiming before the world to operate under public contracts known as The Constitution of the United States of America and The Constitution(s) of the Several States.  What is claimed in Public must appear to be so and there is no opposition, and as all that ought to have been done must appear to have been done, they have no recourse but to consent to our assertion.   They are corporations by their own hand and under public contract.

               Legal fictions may not claim Dominion against the rightful Sovereigns.

               When asked how the District of Columbia, et alia, is to pay its debts and expenses and obligations now totaling over $15 trillion dollars, the Petitioners answer that the “United States of America” as defined as the District of Columbia et alia, must settle its bankruptcy however it sees fit, and not expect the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, to provide one penny more in support of them or in payment of services, than what is reasonably owed under the contract plainly stipulated by The Constitution of the United States of America. 

               Petitioners note that that public contract agrees to pay only for services related to the “common defense” of the 50 States United, and that most of the war-mongering and adventurist activities of the District of Columbia et alia, dba,“United States of America” engaged in against foreign countries now and since 1955 do not amount to “common defense” of the 50 States United, and cannot be claimed as our valid expenses. Ownership of all this equipment, all the profits and interests accrued from investment funds established “in Public Trust” and all enterprises paid for, and all property interests, trusts, corporations, funds, organizations, real estate and claims, titles, deeds, warrants, liens and mortgages upon real property made via the unlawful abuse of the credit of the 50 States and the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, belong by First Right of Payment  in Bankruptcy to those who have created the material basis of the claim.  Furthermore, Petitioners assert that vast amounts of public and private property rightfully belonging to the 50 States United and the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, have been illegally seized by this bankrupt foreign entity calling itself the “United States of America” and that all payments exacted from the 50 States United and the Petitioners by fraudulent means and in excess of the legitimate costs of services contracted for under The Constitution of the United States of America are now due and owing the 50 States United and the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska and the Citizens of all the other Several, now 50 States, respectively.  

               The Petitioners assert that the continued usurpation of Authority by these Foreign Agents is based on fundamental and intolerable fraud and that their continued importunate and non-contractual operation on American shores is in violation of Public Law and International Edict.  Their continued infringement and lack of respect for the public contract under which they have been allowed to continue “in office” is likewise intolerable.

               The Petitioners assert their Sovereign Authority as living entities whose flesh lives and whose blood flows,  Equals to All Men, Sovereign Lords of Creation, granted Equal Dominion, and admitting no separation between themselves and the Divine, such that no other greater Authority or “Divine Right” may now or ever be claimed against them by the Creditors of the “United States of America” defined as “the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, et alia” or their Foreign Agents, the President of the United States of America, the Respondents, Members of Congress, the Secretary of the Treasury, Officers of the US Corporation, et alia.

               The Governors of the 50 States responsible for the Great Fraud swore to uphold the several Republican States of the Union, and by their acts and vacant pledges of property and credit not their own, breached their Duty to protect the People/Citizens and their Posterity from fraud, imposition, avarice and stealthy encroachment.  (See: Atkins et al. vs. U.S., 556 F.2d 1028, pg. 1072, 1074, The Tempting Of America, supra, pgs. 155 - 159, also see, 5 U.S.C.A. 5305 & 5335, Senate ReportNo. 93-549, pgs.  69 - 71, C.R.S. 24-75-101).

               It is the Governors, therefore, who primarily acted in insurrection against the American government and who treasonously violated their Oath of Office by entering as Parties to the 1933 bankruptcy and pledging property they did not own in repayment of debts they did not owe.  The Respondents, Members of Congress, have in this regard merely performed their duty owed a Foreign Corporation.  As their actual Oath of Office proves, the Respondents have been more than loyal to the interests of the government they represent, howbeit, the long-standing subterfuge demanded by the Great Fraud resulted in generations of Americans believing tacitly in the existence of a “dual allegiance” on the part of the Respondents, assuming that the Respondents were somehow “both” Americans and United States Citizens. That assumption is also proved wrong:

               "... the United States is to be regarded as a body politic and corporate.  ... It is suggested that the United States is to be regarded as a domestic corporation, so far as the State of New York is concerned.  We think this contention has no support in reason or authority. ...  The United States is a foreign corporation in relation to a State."  Merriam's Estate, 36 NE 505, 506 22.   See also: See United States v. Germane, 99 U.S. 508 (1879), Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 441, 6 S.Ct. 1121 (1866), etc., dating to Pope v. Commissioner, 138 F.2d 1006, 1009 (6th Cir. 1943); where the state is concerned, the most recent corresponding decision was State v. Pinckney, 276 N.W.2d 433,436 (Iowa 1979).

            There is no provision for “dual citizenship” or any “dual allegiance”---See: Title 8 USC §§ 1101(a)(3), (21) and (22) and Public Law, 15 U.S. Stat., Chapter 249, pps 223-224.

            The Petitioners assert that far from being “representatives” of them or their interests, the Respondents, Members of Congress, Officers of the US Corporation, are in fact operating under Oath as undeclared Foreign Agents in behalf of Foreign Creditors. Any assertion that the Respondents, Members of Congress, are valid elected officials representing one of the 50 States United and at the same time, are officers of a foreign government, the “United States of America” defined as “the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, et alia”, is immediately disproven by both the Public Law cited above and the requirements of Federal Code, thus we have it from both sides of this fence:  the Respondents, Members of Congress, cannot be in “dual allegiance”.  They must either serve the 50 States United, a Protestant government built upon the Sovereignty of All Men, or they serve the Vatican government of the “United States of America” defined as “the District of Columbia, et alia.” 

            To the extent that the Respondents, their Kith or their Kin, ever “served” the 50 States United, it has been merely under contract to provide enumerated services. From that Dishonored contract they have fruitfully endeavored to usurp the rightful government and harness the substance of the Continent and the Citizens thereof as slaves to their plow.    

            The Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, acting in their separate capacities as Natural-born State Citizens, or as “US citizens” owed equal Civil Rights, or as Non-Foreign entities owed Human Rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, have demanded performance under contract, and require both their freedom and protection from any and all presumed Authorities advanced by the Respondents, Members of Congress, Officers of the US Corporation,  in the form of infringing and self-serving legislation, recognizing that these same Respondents, Members of Congress, are acting as undeclared Foreign Agents of a bankrupt Foreign government on American soil.   Petitioners maintain that the issuance of a protective Writ of Habeas Corpus is required to protect the property interests of the Petitioners and also the property interests of the State of Alaska.

               Such principles as "Fraud and Justice never dwell together" (Wingate's Maxims 680), and "A right of action cannot arise out of fraud." (Broom's maxims 297, 729; Cowper's Reports  343; 5 Scott's New Reports 558; 10  Mass.  276; 38 Fed. 800) are foundational truths in all human society, and would be so with or without our approbation. These basic principles are too high in thought and concept to be denied, as is "Due Process", "Just Compensation" and “Justice” itself.  In all respects in the society of Men and Women throughout history and around the world, Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, and cannot be claimed under false and fraudulent pretenses. The color of the cloth one wears will not serve as a shield or buttress for those who seek to cover-up or ignore the usurpations, lies, trickery and omissions, deceits, and purposeful deceptions which have been manifestly employed by this Foreign government calling itself the “United States of America”.

               The Petitioners assert and freely admit that “the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico….et alia” is equivalent to the “United States of America” in the same way that the color orange is in fact an apple. We recognize this purposeful deceit for what it is, along with a great plentitude of others no less purposeful, self-interested, and intentional, all arising from the initial frauds practiced against us and our Progenitors in 1933.

               In 1938, the whole of America was bankrupted by design and by fraud.  The creditors, (foreign powers) seized ownership of the flag, State governments, their laws and constitutions, including every last comma and period, the whole country and its citizens.  These acts of fraud and treason placed Americans in peonage.  The 1937 Edition of the Book of the States openly declared that the people engaged in such activities as the Farming/Agro Related Industry had already been reduced to mere feudal "Tenants" on their Land, see the Book of The States, Book II, Volume II, 1937, p 155.  This is precisely the meaning of all “Deeds of Trust” presently offered by the “government” on all property naturally possessed by allodium----yet another devastating fraud practiced against the Americans. 

               This is the greatest and most singular fraud ever perpetrated in human history. Such icons as Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau presided over it and guided its implementation against the trusting American People.  For the next eight decades, they and their successors, have worked the Great Fraud with alacrity for their private benefit with the result that successive generations of Americans have been robbed of their material wealth, seen the value of their money decline by 96%, and been held in bondage to ever-increasingly oppressive and more apparently illegal acts of legislation undertaken to generate more income for or to protect the interests of the foreign usurpers.

               Either in ignorance or for self-interested reasons, "government officials", both State and federal, have gone along with this outrage and have endeavored to keep it secret from the American people at the same time that they are suffering the outrages accumulated as a direct result of it.

               In 1940, Congress passed the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Sections 105 113). In Section 110(e), the Act authorized any department of the federal government to create a "Federal area" for imposition of the "Public Salary Tax Act" of 1939, the direct progenitor of the Federal Income Tax.  This tax is imposed at 4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 111.  The Social Security Board had already created a "Federal area" overlay.

               Thus the obvious question arises: What is a "Federal area"? A "Federal area" is any area designated by any agency, department, or establishment of the federal government. This includes the Social Security areas designated by the Social Security Administration, any public housing area that has federal funding, a road that has federal funding, and almost everything that the federal government touches through any type of aid. (See Springfield v. Kenny, 104 N.E. 2d 65 (1951 App.)) This "Federal area" purportedly attaches to anyone who has a Social Security Number.

               Petitioners hereby testify that they were lied to by Foreign Agents of the “federal government” and told that they “had to” sign up for a Social Security Number as a “condition of employment” not related in any way to the federal government.  They were coerced, also, to sign “Birth Certificates” for their children----another act of extortion and fraud practiced against them by the criminal “United States of America” domiciled in the District of Columbia.  Petitioners hold these and all other such claims of “ownership” or Authority based on material interest in the Petitioners, their children, or their property to be the result of fraud, misrepresentation, undisclosed contracts, and similar illegal acts undertaken by the Foreign government represented by the Respondents and those Governors of the 50 States acting without granted Authority in 1933.

               Through this mechanism, the so-called federal government, a recognized Foreign government, usurped the Sovereignty of the People, as well as the Sovereignty of the several States, by creating "Federal areas" within the boundaries of the states under the purported authority of Article 4, Section3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the Constitution of the United States of America.

               By this fraudulent base argument, all U.S. citizens [i.e. citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the Union, are classified as "property", franchisees of the federal government, and as an "individual entity".  (See Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct.  773.

               This very material advantage of being able to classify “US citizens” as “property” and to buy, sell, and trade them on the world’s securities exchanges has been very profitable and convenient for the criminals, and has led to their acts of extortion (such as not letting parents of new babies leave the hospital without signing “Birth Certificates”) and coercion (such as telling young people that they “must” sign up for Social Security as a condition of having a job) so as to generate presumptive claims against their victims and “documentary evidence” that the government owns them and that they are “US citizens”, i.e, slaves owned by the federal government.   

               In 1980, President Jimmy Carter transferred ALL American Birth Certificates to the IMF.  Based on the treachery and fraud committed in 1933 by a handful of Governors, and further acts of fraud and usurpation the “US government” has continued to buy, sell, and trade the “value” of American Citizens improperly claimed to be “US citizens” together with their property.  This fraudulent claim of “ownership” is also the basis for the federal government’s claim to enforce Selective Service requirements on our sons and daughters. 

               Petitioners admit that this fraud committed against Americans by these monsters in suits is apt to cause disbelief and a rising gorge, but we know its complete historical development, from concept to completion, and can cite both chapter and verse.  The portion of this that is important to the matter at hand is that the Respondents, Foreign Agents, have looked upon Americans as their  “livestock” for a long time. 

               Armed with their original claims based on fraud committed back in the 1930’s, and a stack of “documentation”---Birth Certificates, Marriage Licenses, Drivers License and so on----they have found it easy to assert their silent claims against Americans in venues of International Law, using mere legal presumption to convict them, abuse them, steal their money, create liens against their property, send them to war, and continue their vile predations unchallenged.  They are no doubt amazed to read these words and grasp their import, as it must seem that the horses are suddenly talking back to them after 80 years of silence.          

               Under the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Sections 105-113), the federal government has created "Federal areas" within the boundaries of all the several States. These areas are similar to any territory that the federal government acquires through purchase, conquest or treaty, thereby imposing federal territorial law upon all people in these "federal areas". Federal “territorial law” is evidenced by the Executive Branch's yellow fringed U.S. flag displayed in schools and most courtrooms.

               In 1966, Congress being severely compromised, passed the "Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966, by which the entire taxing and monetary system i.e.  "Essential Engine" (See: Federalist Papers No. 31) was placed under the Uniform Commercial Code. (See:     Public Law 89-719, Legislative History, pg. 3722, also see C.R.S. 5-1- 106).

               The Uniform Commercial Code was, of course, promulgated by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in  collusion with the American Law Institute for the "banking and business interests." (See: Handbook of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, (1966) Ed. pgs. 152 & 153).

               Things steadily grew worse and on March 28, 1970, President Richard Nixon issued Proclamation No. 3972, declaring (again) an "emergency" because the Postal Employees struck against the de facto government for higher pay, due to inflation of the paper "Bills of Credit." aka “Federal Reserve Notes”. (See: Senate Report No. 93-549, pg.  596)  Nixon placed the U.S. Postal Department under the control of the "Department of Defense." (See: Department Of The Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 (1969)).

               Petitioners assert that claim of and continuance of “emergency powers” has been the object of the “War on Terror” which provides a perpetual excuse for the federal government to claim that a “state of emergency” exists and is just another iteration of the same, tired, useful LIE serving merely to allow the federal government to continue to operate under the same unlawful “emergency powers” it claimed in 1933, even in the absence of any provable or even plausible threat.  The point is that they claimed these powers and established these “laws” and regulations under conditions of fraud, and as a result, all these contract-infringing “laws” and regulations illegally imposed against the Petitioners must be scrupulously removed and held null and void ab initio.

               The constantly contrived "emergencies" which have been used as the excuse for tyranny, robbery, gross fraud, and political usurpation of our rightful government, have created numerous abuses and usurpations, and abridgements of delegated Powers and Authority as stated in Senate Report 93-549  merely the most recent examples of which are represented by The Patriot Act, NDAA 2012, and the proposed Enemy Expatriation Act.

               The statements heard in the Federal and State Tribunals, on numerous occasions, to the effect that Constitutional arguments are "immaterial", "frivolous" etc., are based upon concealment of the fraud being practiced against Americans and the equally well-concealed existence of the contractual duties owed to them. 

               Diligent scholars have long realized that in the 18th century the word “federal” was a synonym for “contract” and that the “federal government” is a “contract government” and not as is often assumed, a “federation” of states.  That this is true can be easily derived from the necessity of imposing direct per capita taxation in a federation of states, and the fact that no such per capita direct tax has ever been imposed.  The fact that the Constitution is a Contract and that the “debt” implied by the word “Constitution” is the debt incurred by the States to pay for specific services secured under contract is further obscured by describing those services as enumerated “Powers”. 

               In the 18th century, “powers” implied the basis of taking action, as in “empowerment”.  The Constitution agreement empowered, as in allowed, the federal government under contract to provide certain common services for all the States.

               The Petitioners offer this analogy--- 13 members of a condo association (associated under the Articles of Confederation) got together over beer and pretzels in Philadelphia and decided to create a new company (the federal government) to provide snow removal, lawn care, security, and several other named services (enumerated Powers)  in behalf of the condo owners (States). They called their written contract setting up the new service company “the Constitution” and agreed to pay dues (taxes) to the new company in exchange for these services.  At the same time, some members got nervous and wanted to make it clear what “services” and actions were NOT to be undertaken by the new company (government) and so they added stipulations clearly stating that the new company would NOT be allowed to block anyone’s driveway, or show partiality about emptying dumpsters, or clean the swimming pool (the Bill of Rights) and for a time, things went on very well. 

               More members joined the condo association and paid their dues and everyone prospered, but then, new management took over the company providing services under contract, and these people were determined to extort more money and exercise far more power than their predecessors.  They became predatory toward the original condo association and used their profits to set up their own condo association, which they named after the original one.  This allowed them to charge off the costs associated with their new private condo association and its separate service company (government) against the original condo association.  After all, they had the same name.  Who is to know?  Time went on, and the management of the service company got greedier and greedier.  They bought off or intimidated everyone to the point where they claimed to own or control nearly everything, and they blatantly ignored the requirements of their original contract. 

               Some of the condo owners finally stood up and said----“Wait a minute! ---- and then everyone living in the condos requested a Writ of Habeas Corpus to defend against a Bll of Detainer set forth against them by the service company.

               At this point, the service company is fraudulently claiming to own the original condos, the condo association, and everyone and everything living in and associated with the original condos. Via fraud and antagonistic unlawful “legislation” they are willing to kill, imprison, indefinitely detain, defame, and dishonor anyone who stands in their way. 

               The Respondents are clearly, unequivocally, and demonstrably engaged in criminal acts against the 50 States United and the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska. Not only are they infringing against their public contract, The Constitution of the United States of America, the only valid contract existing between them and the Petitioners, Inhabitants of Alaska, they are operating the American government, including the “State of Alaska” under False Flag as undeclared Foreign Agents under color of law and conditions of gross fraud.

              

Views: 448

Reply to This

© 2017   Created by APN Founding Editor.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service